« Yale Picks Top Ten Family-Friendly Firms | Main | Are Women Now Ambitious Because They've Given Up on Finding a Hubby? »

Sued for Sexual Harassment, Yet Lauded for Being Family-Friendly

Vivia Chen

May 2, 2012

 Skeptical.women.Andres Rodriguez - Fotolia.comJust how reliable are those "best places to work" lists? Judging from what I'm hearing, the answer is: not very. Actually, some offer stronger views. Says one lawyer about the newly released Yale Law Women's list of top 10 family-friendly firms for 2012:

Why are Yale women focusing on THIS issue? Why aren’t they recognizing firms that have women in leadership, women in rainmaking positions, women in power? And the firms they have cited here, ours included, are not exactly examples of “women in power–friendly firms.”

Several readers expressed outrage that Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo was named a top family-friendly firm by both Yale Law Women and Working Mother magazine. The reason? The firm has been sued by female associates in two well-publicized cases for sexual discrimination. (In one case, Dawn Gallina won $520,000 on her retaliation claim; she also won her appeal for punitive damages; the case settled in 2005.)

Ironically, plaintiff Kamee Verdrager, whose case is still pending, won an important battle against Mintz Levin just a day before Yale announced its list. (Verdrager was cleared of unethical conduct for accessing documents from the firm's computer system that support her sexual harassment claim. Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly has a fascinating account of the "smoking-gun" voicemail that Verdrager discovered in which the firm's diversity chair warned the firm's head about harassment problems.)

Now a solo practitioner, Verdrager says she's shocked that her former firm keeps getting accolades for being family-friendly.  "It just amazes me. . . . Neither Yale nor Working Mother contacted me about my case." She adds, "Dawn Gallina and I are not the only ones who have complained [about discrimination]. There are others."

But Marvin Lim, who led the Yale top ten law firm project this year, says his group did due diligence and that it was aware of the discrimination claims against Mintz Levin. "We got feedback from alumni to help us gauge [the impact of] those cases," he says. "We stand by the list," though he adds that the criteria for the list is limited to certain information—like availability and utilization of part-time, child care, and family leave provisions.

Jennifer Rubin, the chair of Mintz Levin's diversity committee, wouldn't comment on the Verdrager suit. But she says, "I see claims every day—many which have no merit." Now a partner in the firm's employment law group, Rubin says that she herself worked part-time before becoming a partner: "I came into the firm with young children, and the firm accommodated me." The firm, she adds, has always had an inclusive culture: "It was started 75 years ago by guys who couldn't get a job because they were Jewish." 

But Verdrager says Mintz Levin's culture was precisely the problem. She says gender discrimination was systemic at the firm: "I don't think they take [harassment] problems seriously. They deny, deny, then attack employees who dare to complain."

So what's the takeaway here? "One can have great policies and still have discrimination," says Cynthia Calvert, a former senior official at the Project for Attorney Retention and the Center for WorkLife Law. It's one thing to say, “Here are the firms with the best work/life balance programs,” but quite another to say, "These are the best 'family-friendly' firms."

In other words, it's the spirit rather than the letter of the policies that should matter.

What do you think of these types of  "best" firms lists? Do they award the right firms? Or those with the best public relations?

 Related post: "Can You Trust Working Mother's List of Top Family-Friendly Firms?"

Get the latest from The Careerist—free! Sign up today--see box on upper right corner.

Do you have topics you'd like to discuss or tips to share? E-mail The Careerist's chief blogger, Vivia Chen, at VChen@alm.com.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This article conflates women-friendly with family friendly. Sure, there is most likley a high degree of overlap between the two, but a firm can be family-friendly without being woman-friendly and vice versa. Some women may not care about family-friendly policies and some people who care about family friendly policies may not be women.

Mintz Levin clearly didn't belong on the list. One that did, but that was overlooked, is Munger, Tolles & Olson. It has terrific support for working mothers including onsite childcare. Moreover, its managing partner is a women. It offers both practical and policy-level support.
And, no, I have no ties to MTO.

I am shocked that Yale Law did not even mention the lawsuits in its discussion of Mintz Levin. This fact alone diminishes the credibility of the Yale "Family-Friendly" List. I don't see how a firm could be considered "family-friendly" yet espouse a culture of gender discrimination and/or sexual harassment.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe to get The Careerist via e-mail

Enter your e-mail address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

About The Careerist

The Careerist takes an inside look at how lawyers shape their careers and manage their lives. The blog aims to dissect developments in the profession, provide useful information and advice, and give lawyers a platform to voice their views. The goal is to provide a fresh, provocative take on the state of lawyering.

About Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen, The Careerist's chief blogger, has been covering the business and culture of law firms for a decade. A former corporate lawyer, Chen is fascinated by those who thrive (as well as those who don't) in the legal profession. Her take: Success in the law (and life) doesn't always travel a linear path. If you have topics you'd like to discuss or information to share, contact her: VChen@alm.com

To search across all ALM blogs, go to www.Lexis.com.