« The New Must-Have: 20 Weeks of Paid Paternity Leave | Main | Best and Worst Law Schools for Jobs »

Your Boss Thinks You're Too Sexy

The Careerist

May 26, 2016

Woman-yoga-Article-201605241449-1I know being a yoga instructor is not the same as being a lawyer. But hear me out anyway.

Last week, a judge in New York threw out a claim by a female yoga instructor who claimed she was fired from a chiropractor clinic for being too attractive. Reports The New York Law Journal:

Dilek Edwards alleged she was fired because of a jealous perception by her boss that Edwards was attractive to her husband, with whom Edwards worked, and threatening to their marriage.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Shlomo Hagler ruled that a spouse's jealousy was a lawful reason for termination, citing cases from other jurisdictions holding that attractive females are not a protected class under discrimination law.

Of course, attractive people are not a protected class. What do they need protection from? As any first-grader knows, those born cute or beautiful get all the breaks in life—more money, more attention and just a lot more love. So who cares if this pretty woman lost a job because her boss's wife and co-business partner (who's a former Playboy Playmate herself, by the way) is insanely jealous.

But then I read the ruling closer and I realized it has wider implications, particularly for women who work for married male bosses—which pretty much describes the situation for women in professions like law and finance.

"The idea that a married boss in New York can now fire an attractive woman on the grounds that he might be unable to control his sexual desires turns the law upside down," Maimon Kirschenbaum, the lawyer for the woman, tells NYLJ. "That’s his problem, not the woman’s."

Kirschenbaum is absolutely right. Why should a woman lose her job because her boss (or his wife) might find her too hot? (In her complaint, Edwards says she received favorable reviews about her work and describes her relationship with her boss as strictly professional.)

Though women now constitute about 50 percent of law students and new associates at many big firms, they still face a thousand and one subtle barriers. Some people—actually, make that men—still have hangups about working with women, particularly if they find the woman remotely alluring. For instance, economist Sylvia Ann Hewlett finds that 64 percent of senior men would not sponsor a woman because they fear that rumors of an inappropriate relationship will erupt.

So we are back to the theme of women as potential seducers of good, hardworking men. And the New York court is giving that archaic meme its blessings.

The issue, as I see it, is not whether attractive people need protection. Rather, the question is what to do with men who can't handle themselves in a professional manner in the presence of an attractive woman.

Let me make a suggestion: Grow up, boys.





Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

United States is a very odd working country when it comes to law. It's all about claiming and it should not be that way at all! First of all I have had a chance to meet Dilek Turan Edwards in real life. I have spent some quality time with her. Honestly telling she is a serious gold digger and can do anything if she sees a wealthy man. Her being married is not an obstacle for her. She keeps cheating the poor dentist husband and guess what he is the one who supports the family. She can't even earn a dime cause she is extremely lazy and thinks that she is a very attractive. I haven't witnessed the facts between her and the employer but trust me I have witnessed so many lies and her obsession about money and wealth. She can lie about anything without feeling ashamed. And they say that yoga is spiritual hell yes!

That ruling was pathetic, that's gender bias. No one chooses to either be attractive or ugly, that's just God's work. It doesn't justify her dismissal. I am a guy but clearly don't agree. Unless her performance at work was bad, that is not a reason.

I agree with you. This ruling puts appearance and not performance at the center of hiring decisions. It opens the door for not hiring a woman because she isn't attractive enough.

My first reaction to this is visceral!! I fervently pray the defendant appeals this inane and sexist decision.
I really hope someone or some body of authority takes a closer look at the biases this judge is carrying. And I pray as a woman in the financial and legal field that this decision is overturned.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe to get The Careerist via e-mail

Enter your e-mail address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

About The Careerist

The Careerist takes an inside look at how lawyers shape their careers and manage their lives. The blog aims to dissect developments in the profession, provide useful information and advice, and give lawyers a platform to voice their views. The goal is to provide a fresh, provocative take on the state of lawyering.

About Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen, The Careerist's chief blogger, has been covering the business and culture of law firms for a decade. A former corporate lawyer, Chen is fascinated by those who thrive (as well as those who don't) in the legal profession. Her take: Success in the law (and life) doesn't always travel a linear path. If you have topics you'd like to discuss or information to share, contact her: VChen@alm.com

To search across all ALM blogs, go to www.Lexis.com.