« Lawyers: You Are to Blame for Trump | Main | How to Deal with Assholes »

Death to Performance Reviews!

Vivia Chen

September 5, 2017

C7RyfLK3

Maybe it's not as dreaded as a colonoscopy. But does anyone with a lick of sense look forward to performance reviews?

Most people I know regard it as either a waste of time or a torture session. If the review is positive, the employee is usually told to keep up the good work, except do more—and faster! And when it's bad, it's an assault and a set-up for a future firing. (Arguably, every review is a pretext for firing, since there are always areas for employee "improvement.")

I am not alone in my antipathy toward reviews. Samuel Culbert, a professor at UCLA's Anderson School of Management, has made a career of bashing this corporate ritual. The author of "Get Rid of the Performance Review and Beyond Bullsh*t," Culbert has called the review "a curse on corporate America" and a "dysfunctional pretense" of objective measures.

In his most recent book, "Good People, Bad Managers," he zeroes in on corporate culture as the culprit, particularly the "cultural expectation of perfection" and the way it perverts performance reviews. Corporate culture, he writes, denies the reality that people are imperfect, "because imperfect people can be expected to err, and the culture at large is intolerant of mistakes."

As a former associate turned journalist, I'd say that neatly sums up the ethos of major law firms. One bad grade on your law school transcript, and you won't get through the pearly gates of Big Law. And if you do make the cut but make a mistake somewhere along the road, be prepared that it could cost your career. Law is the only profession I law where a typo can make you feel unworthy, deficient and dirty.

The hypocrisy, of course, is that those on the top are imperfect people too who've probably made their share of mistakes. "You've got a flawed person with more power alleging that he or she can accurately access the strengths and flaws of a person with less power," writes Culbert. "And no one is reading that person a Miranda."

The real shame, according to Culbert, is that the practice hinders honest discourse, the sort that would benefit employee, manager and the company or firm.

So what's the solution? A 360 review in which the employee gets a say in the boss's performance? Culbert is dismissive: "Bosses always say, 'my door is always open.' But no one goes through those doors unless it's to suck up." And what about giving on-going feedback instead of formal reviews? "It's the same thing. It's still a one-way street," says Culbert.

What he advocates is a change in mindset. "Think how different firms would be with a managerial mentality where partners were held accountable for helping each imperfect associate be their best and were incentivized for doing so, and associates had nothing to lose speaking their minds." Culbert says he's not talking about eliminating hierarchy: "I'm for two-sided accountability with the report accountable for the results, and the boss accountable for establishing the conditions for the subordinate to succeed. I'm talking skin-in-the-game management where the boss has a motive for helping reports succeed."

Sounds good.

But don't hold your breath for change, says William Henderson, a professor at Indiana University Maurer School of Law and a former Big Law associate. Partners in big firms are not vested in developing associates because "they are rewarded for other activities like client service, billing time and bringing in business"—the stuff that contributes directly to their bottom line What associates don't realize, he adds, is that partners "still operate in an eat what you kill environment." The result is that partners have little incentive for giving meaningful reviews, much less an exchange of ideas. "When an associate has outlived their economic value, care is taken finally  to deliver a clear message."

The bottom line: We all know that performance reviews are shams, but they will likely stay the way are.

All in all, there are more benefits to getting a colonoscopy.

 

vchen@alm.com

Follow me on Twitter @lawcareerist.

 

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe to get The Careerist via e-mail

Enter your e-mail address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

About The Careerist

The Careerist takes an inside look at how lawyers shape their careers and manage their lives. The blog aims to dissect developments in the profession, provide useful information and advice, and give lawyers a platform to voice their views. The goal is to provide a fresh, provocative take on the state of lawyering.

About Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen, The Careerist's chief blogger, has been covering the business and culture of law firms for a decade. A former corporate lawyer, Chen is fascinated by those who thrive (as well as those who don't) in the legal profession. Her take: Success in the law (and life) doesn't always travel a linear path. If you have topics you'd like to discuss or information to share, contact her: VChen@alm.com

To search across all ALM blogs, go to www.Lexis.com.