In an editorial in The National Law Journal, Stanford Law School professor Deborah Rhode, author of The Beauty Bias, makes the case that there's a prejudice against those not blessed with good looks, and that it is a form of discrimination as insidious as racism or sexism:
Attractiveness is a highly imperfect proxy for the qualities that make for effective lawyering. The difficulty is not so much the bump for the beautiful as the penalties for those who fail to measure up. Adverse treatment on the basis of physical characteristics reinforces invidious stereotypes and compromises merit principles.
And women, she says, pay a particularly heavy toll: "They spend vastly more time and money on appearance, partly because they are judged more harshly than men for overweight and age-related characteristics. Unlike their male colleagues, female professionals do not achieve gravitas with their wrinkles."
No question that women are more self-conscious about their looks, and beautiful people have an edge in life. In fact, one recent Cornell University study found that criminal defendants who look unappealing get harsher sentences.
But in the legal profession? Isn't this one of the rare fields where high grades (and the implicit ability to withstand grueling, tedious work) trump everything from bad acne and personality ticks to poor table manners? I know--and you know--scores of successful lawyers who are not exactly beauties. But their tenacity and smarts eventually land them on top of the heap. In a perverse way, law comes close to being a true meritocracy.
Is this tough legal market changing the rules? Can firms now demand top grades and top looks? Is the legal profession getting vain? Or didn't we notice it before?
If you have topics you'd like to discuss, or information to share for The Careerist, e-mail lead writer Vivia Chen at [email protected].
I just had a job interview and 2 women were waiting, one after the other they didn't pass, but a guy came just after and he was able to be passed and was so happy about it that i thought this all situation was so lame
Posted by: איפור ערב | November 21, 2015 at 07:26 AM
It's one thing to have beauty, but it would be a fallacy to conclude that one glides upwards on the proverbial ladder on this alone. To be truly successful, a woman with beauty must also be able to win over (rather than trump and destroy) both women and men sharing their company in the workplace. While looks may arguably help one to "get in the door" over someone less attractive, one could persuasively make the case that attention to detail in aesthetics, and/or overall put-togetherness with respect to appearance are easily likened to qualities that are reflective of the work product delivered by a person owning these characteristics. As a general rule, such qualities will pierce more than one facet of a persons lifestyle. It is obviously likely, and therefore unexcusable to feign ignorance to the fact that most assume, in regards to the woman with her glasses and hair askew, that she is not as organized, attentive, or skilled in time management as the woman who maintains a perfect bun, ironed blouse, and high heels while working in a similarly demanding environment. Nor does this convlusively mean that either the former or the latter has a better or worse work product or is more or less socially apt.
Contrary to popular belief, beauty in the workplace can and often does act as an encumbrance to genuine recognition. I pride myself on maintaining an attractive appeal with respect to my appearance both physically and on paper. It is those who display a well-rounded lifestyle and an inviting charisma to match that are inevitably destined for true, earned success. Where a fantastic initial impression is deduced by a potential employer from ones CV, and is then materialized in the form of a healthy, friendly, and beautiful woman, one would be hard pressed in finding a legitimate reason not to hire.
Posted by: Jenna Gushue | August 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM
Why do you have to be a "professional women" to have to not deal with catty women and looking beautiful? Those working for a professional women in a professional environment (or anywhere) should not have to be subjected to such a thing? Is that not part of discrimination in the work environment? Of course, at the end of the day, we all know it happens.
Posted by: Hope | June 26, 2012 at 04:26 PM
Attractive people always have an advantage over unattractive people in virtually every professional setting. It is not discrimination, it is just reality.
Posted by: Bill | July 25, 2011 at 04:08 PM
I am remembering reading once in a study which showed that while women are more attractive have an easier time getting hired, getting promoted because they have a much harder time.
Posted by: קוסמטיקאית | May 4, 2011 at 08:57 AM
Everyone knows that beautiful women get all the breaks. From junior high to retirement.
Posted by: Doug Sauber | April 18, 2011 at 07:15 PM
Hi! Hi! This is a beautiful site. I love its content and its design. I think either lawyer or doctor every one needs physical attraction.Thanks for sharing .
Posted by: Forex brokers | March 25, 2011 at 06:49 AM
Hi !! every body ! I'm working as a Professional makeup expert , this article emphasizes the importance of physical beauty & advantages of it , in this highly competitive world.ThanQ . keep it up.
Posted by: לזורגן | March 12, 2011 at 01:48 PM
Hi, Every day i observe so many working women with out proper attention about their physical appearance .I can simply say that attraction is a basic need in a modern world. thanks!!
Posted by: קוסמטיקאית | March 6, 2011 at 01:57 AM
Let's put it this way: In the last 10 years, I have worked at one major NY law firm, 2 Fortune 500 companies and one small law department. At all places the ALL of the women have been very attractive (at worst) to stunning. If you are tall and pretty, but not unusual enough to be a model, clearly you have a career alternative as a lawyer. I have only worked with 2 women over the age of 50 in any of these places (and both of them were very attractive). Only one female lawyer I have worked with was significantly overweight (but her face was extremely attractive). In contrast, most of the men have been paunchy, at least half have been short. Only at an entertainment firm was there an unusual high number of really good looking men (about 10 of them) who were also in fairly good shape. There were many many successful men at these place over the age of 50. You can decide for yourself what my observations prove. Guess I am lucky enough to make good-looking-enough grade to even get one of these jobs.
Posted by: Hillary | June 1, 2010 at 04:47 PM
It's difficult enough to survive in a competitive market without worrying about fashion trends, beauty tips and catty women. Professional woman should not be sucked into such mundane politics. Who has time for it? By worrying about those things, you give them power over you, allow them to distract you from the primary focus of business, and drive a wedge into the potentially smooth mechanics of office workings. Such mediocrity and smokescreens have no place in a working environment. Personally, I believe if someone - male or female - in the office tried to make this an issue, I'd call them on it immediately and put a stop to it. I've worked up from receptionist, legal secretary, office manager and paralegal and I've never allowed this kind of distraction to slow me down. Lead, follow, or get out of the way. Women who gauge success by shopping, dating, salons, and fashions should be selling cosmetics, not working in a legal office. It reflects a lack of control at the helm for this type of thing to become problematic.
Posted by: Mary | June 1, 2010 at 11:07 AM
i remember once reading a study that showed that while more attractive women have an easier time getting hired, they have a much harder time getting promoted.
Posted by: Jody | May 29, 2010 at 05:59 PM
I agree with ShCs, women are vicious!!!! I can write from experience: I have worked in all-women firms and firms with a mix of men and women's. As in all walks of life, we need a balance definitely.
Posted by: Marthona | May 27, 2010 at 04:31 PM
Working in Jacksonville, FL - the worst critics are the other females in the office. They only care about the salon I use, where I shop, who I'm dating, what I drive and where I live. If an attractive person walks through our door the women are vicious. It's truly shallow and ridiculous.
Posted by: ShCs | May 27, 2010 at 03:38 PM
No, lawyers aren't generally great beauties, but of course women lawyers are judged more harshly... just like female political candidates are. Remember all the nasty comments about Hillary and her outfits?
Posted by: Debby | May 20, 2010 at 03:39 PM