« 20+ Percent of Fortune 500 GC Are Female | Main | Screaming Bosses Are So Yesterday »

Women Can Ask—But They Won't Get It

Vivia Chen

August 14, 2012

Begging woman© Odua Images - Fotolia.comDidn't we identify at least a partial fix for the gender gap in pay? For years now, the popular wisdom has been that women must be more assertive about pressing for more money. They have to learn to negotiate for what they want.

Well, ladies, you can negotiate until you're blue in the face—and you'll still make less. In fact, negotiating might make you worse off. That's essentially the finding of a study of 184 managers (male and female).

Maura Belliveau, a professor of management at Long Island University in New York, found that managers were likely to give men substantially higher raises than their female employees—if they had the opportunity to explain the reason for the shortfall to the women. (Participants in the study were randomly assigned to a male or female employee with similar job profiles; some managers were told they could explain their decisions to the employee, while others were told they could not.)

Here's are some of the study's key findings:

- Managers gave male employees 71 percent of available funds but only 29 percent to female employees, "when managers knew that they could explain their pay decisions, citing limited resources."

- But if managers didn't have the opportunity to explain their decision, both sexes got equal raises.

- Managers gave men the same raises, regardless of whether the explanation opportunity exists.

"The difference [in men and women's pay] shows up more if it's a high-paying profession like law," Belliveau told me over the phone. "It's not hostile gender bias, but more of a benevolent belief that a woman will value the explanation as to why she's getting paid less. They could be thinking that the explanation is a substitute for pay."

Personally, I 'd rather see corporate love manifested in the form of cold, hard cash rather than some drawn-out excuse about why the raise is so pathetic. It's like listening to a lousy boyfriend explain why he's not ready to make a commitment after years of togetherness. You just know that the reasons are going to sound lame.

But maybe women are suckers for these explanations, though Belliveau said her research refutes this theory. Certainly, management seems to think so. "Managers don’t think they’re treating woman unfairly," said Belliveau. "With men, [managers] don’t think they’ll care about the explanation as much. It’s a stereotype that women will appreciate an explanation."

So I'm not sure where this study leaves us if managers are self-deluding. Belliveau agrees that women are at a distinct disadvantage from the get-go. Giving the lion's share of allocated funds to men means men don't need to negotiate to get a good raise.

Belliveau, however, is not discouraged. Making people aware of the biases in their decision making process is half the battle, she said: "The way I see managers taking gender research seriously is heartening to me. It was a much harder sell 10 to 15 years ago. "

In the meantime, though, should women voice their desire for better pay? Yes, said Belliveau: "Women should make it explicit that salary is a way they measure how the company values them."

Not that it would make a difference.

Get The Careerist in your morning email. Sign up today—see box on upper right corner.

Do you have topics you'd like to discuss or tips to share? Email The Careerist's chief blogger, Vivia Chen, at VChen@alm.com.


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Irritating, isn't it? You report on a study evidencing women being paid less than men based on nothing but gender, and what do you get?
Truck Accident Lawyer: "I don't think women are paid differently just because of their gender." But that's what the study found, Truck, exactly that. That's what the article is about.

Evidence? Who needs it when you can have an opinion instead?

No-one should be paid more than another because of their gender and not how well they do their job, particularly those who can't spell paid.

Is this not illegal in some way under the EEOC? I am experiencing this very thing right now.

Has anyone factored in the oldest reason in the world that women are victims of pay discrimination -- the assumption that they don't need as much money because they are not supporting a family? I think that sexist, self, fulfilling and often false assumption underlies the one people are giving. Often in upper-middle class jobs, the assumption is that a lady is working for "enrichment" and "play money" -- therefore, its easier to pay her the minimum. These assumptions are often totally false and very destructive to achieving eventual gender equality.

I disagree with this .I don't think women are payed differently just because of their gender. Sometimes the company can't afford a substantial raise.

In my business the reason for the tiny pay raises is always the same - the company just doesn't have the money. No matter how much money the company made. And there's no point in arguing - you'll never get more, and the decisions are made well in advance of the conversation. Oh well. I compensate in other ways.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Subscribe to get The Careerist via e-mail

Enter your e-mail address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

About The Careerist

The Careerist takes an inside look at how lawyers shape their careers and manage their lives. The blog aims to dissect developments in the profession, provide useful information and advice, and give lawyers a platform to voice their views. The goal is to provide a fresh, provocative take on the state of lawyering.

About Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen

Vivia Chen, The Careerist's chief blogger, has been covering the business and culture of law firms for a decade. A former corporate lawyer, Chen is fascinated by those who thrive (as well as those who don't) in the legal profession. Her take: Success in the law (and life) doesn't always travel a linear path. If you have topics you'd like to discuss or information to share, contact her: VChen@alm.com

To search across all ALM blogs, go to www.Lexis.com.