Contrary to my usual opinionated self, I am agnostic about this latest brouhaha: Michelle Obama's bangs. (In case you've been hibernating during this cold spell, she inaugurated a new "do" at the inaugural.) Though I'm not entirely sold on the look (it looks eerily similar to Jane Fonda's 1971 shag in Klute, no?), I certainly don't think it's awful either.
In fact, I can understand why so many people find it cute. Those perky bangs give Obama a youthful, girlish aura—but therein lies the problem. While it might be fine to look adorable when you are the nation's hostess with the mostess, what happens when other middle-aged women imitate that look at work? Will they look stylish or silly?
"I am a big fan of MO but I really think the bangs don’t work," says a law firm consultant in Chicago. "It’s one thing to try to look young, but I don’t think the 'do' is age-appropriate. . . . She looks like a kid with an adult face." The First Lady, she adds, should look "elegant and chic but not adolescent."
A male partner at an Am Law 200 firm, who seldom weighs in on style issues, is equally alarmed: "Michelle looks ridiculous. It's a disaster. What does she think she's doing with those bangs?"
Most lawyers I contacted, though, like Obama's new look. "She looks great," says a female lawyer in L.A. "Her hair is healthy—no obvious extensions—and sleek and stylish." At least four other female lawyers echo that point. One says that Obama's bangs give her a "softer look," while another adds that it's just "silly" to find fault with her new appearance.
Honestly, I can't get worked up about Obama's bangs on either side of the fashion aisle (I get much more rattled about her "mom-in-chief" designation). But I am curious as to why everyone else is getting so bent out of shape about it.
What some might find upsetting, says fashion stylist David Zyla, is that Obama is keeping more of her face under wraps. "Before, her forehead was revealed. Now, it's covered, and people are responding to the fact that we're not seeing her whole face. She's beautiful, and now she's hiding part of it." People get unsettled by women's hair changes, he adds—"it's like when a man gets a mustache or beard."
The key issue, suggests Zyla, is not whether middle-aged women can wear bangs and be taken seriously, but if they have the éclat to make it work: "If you have Michelle Obama's confidence, and you are attractive, you can definitely do that kind of hair style."
I can't argue with Zyla, though I'm not sure the issue is settled. Obama might be able to pull off the bangs, but what about the rest of us?
Do you have topics you'd like to discuss or tips to share? Email chief blogger Vivia Chen at [email protected].
Follow The Careerist on Twitter: twitter.com/lawcareerist
Photo on right: Jane Fonda in Klute.
I actually like her haircut, but it could be better.
Posted by: Jared | March 22, 2013 at 02:33 PM
Naught naughty, Vivia. To Jennifer's point above, don't start talking about Hillary's glasses, which are much more of a style choice than Michelle's hair.
Posted by: Diva | January 24, 2013 at 12:15 PM
Mrs. Obama's hair looks great & people should try being nice about the change. I'm an over 50 corporate lawyer and I have always had bangs and wouldn't consider changing it just because of my age.
Beth M
Posted by: Beth M | January 24, 2013 at 10:36 AM
http://sizeandsubstance.com/2012/08/27/should-working-women-over-40-cut-their-hair/
At least FLOTUS has the pluck to change her style. When was the last time Ms. Chen tried a new look?
Posted by: Janet | January 24, 2013 at 10:28 AM
It could be carried off by some but on her particular facial structure it's just not flattering. But so what? Anyone remember Hillary Clinton's headband? And surely MO, like many of us, has improved with age. See her in a People mag shot of her from high school:
http://www.google.com/imgres?hl=en&sa=X&tbo=d&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&biw=1260&bih=771&tbm=isch&tbnid=6158Msokb70z9M:&imgrefurl=http://www.people.com/people/michelle_obama/biography/0,,,00.html&docid=RDO0jlYF_IZbPM&imgurl=http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2009/database/michelleobama/michelle_obama9_240.jpg&w=180&h=240&ei=iEwBUa-3Lsfd2QXIiIDABw&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=942&vpy=124&dur=6578&hovh=192&hovw=144&tx=61&ty=213&sig=102103039647792957123&page=1&tbnh=136&tbnw=105&start=0&ndsp=31&ved=1t:429,r:6,s:0,i:106
Posted by: SJ Smith | January 24, 2013 at 10:04 AM
I find it disappointing that this is a topic of your blog, which is billed as "The Careerist takes an inside look at how lawyers shape their careers and manage their lives. The blog aims to dissect developments in the profession, provide useful information and advice, and give lawyers a platform to voice their views. The goal is to provide a fresh, provocative take on the state of lawyering." How do Michelle Obama's bangs relate to useful career advise for lawyers?
What's coming tomorrow? A discussion of Hillary Clinton's appearance at the hearings rather than the substance of the content? Oh, wait, I think you've already done a blog post about her longer hair style.
We women are our own worst enemy, and continuing these types of things encourages others to continue viewing us as frivolous and "less than." You should be embarassed that you bothered that many attorneys with a question about Michelle Obama's bangs. It's unprofessional and demeaning.
Posted by: Jennifer | January 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM